Merit Systems Protection Board Statistics by Administrative Judge Stationed in the New York Regional Office Fiscal Year 2008 Attorney ExamiSummary Detail Total Percent Booker, Barry G. Dismissed With Prejudice 41 55.4% Dismissed Without Prejudice 18 24.3% For Agency 1 1.4% For Employee Appellant 0.0% Settled 14 18.9% TOTAL 74 Farnes, Milagros Dismissed With Prejudice 26 57.8% Dismissed Without Prejudice 4 8.9% For Agency 3 6.7% For Employee Appellant 1 2.2% Settled 11 24.4% TOTAL 45 Hallock, Joseph A. Dismissed With Prejudice 47 63.5% Dismissed Without Prejudice 10 13.5% For Agency 3 4.1% For Employee Appellant 1 1.4% Settled 13 17.6% TOTAL 74 Joseph, Arthur S. Dismissed With Prejudice 46 58.2% Dismissed Without Prejudice 6 7.6% For Agency 2 2.5% For Employee Appellant 0.0% Settled 25 31.6% TOTAL 79 Ruggiero, Joann M. Dismissed With Prejudice 32 42.7% Dismissed Without Prejudice 6 8.0% For Agency 5 6.7% For Employee Appellant 0.0% Settled 32 42.7% TOTAL 75 Grand Total of Dockets for MSPB attorney examiners stationed in New York 347 Three (3) Administrative Judges with no decisions for the employee appellant: Barry G. Booker, Arthur S. Joseph, Joann M. Ruggiero KEY: DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE / declared outside of MSPB's decision-making role. Categories include: Cancel or failure to prosecute, Jurisdiction or res judicata, Timeliness, Withdrawn by Appellant, (Action) Terminated DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE / request for postponement subject to being revisited FOR AGENCY / decision in favor of agency categories include: Affirmed, Corrective action not ordered FOR EMPLOYEE APPELLANT / decision in favor of employee categories include: Mitigate agency action, remanded to agency, reversed SETTLED / settled Data are from MSPB's FOIA grant CB10-80. Statistics exclude fields where appeal type specifies CSRA, FERS or FERCCA benefit claims