Merit Systems Protection Board Statistics by Administrative Judge Stationed in the Denver Regional Office Fiscal Year 2008 Attorney Examiner ASummary Detail Total Percent Albornoz, Laura M. Dismissed With Prejudice 33 39.8% Dismissed Without Prejudice 12 14.5% For Agency 4 4.8% For Employee Appellant 3 3.6% Settled 31 37.3% TOTAL 83 Humphrey, Kelly M. Dismissed With Prejudice 28 29.8% Dismissed Without Prejudice 17 18.1% For Agency 9 9.6% For Employee Appellant 7 7.4% Settled 33 35.1% TOTAL 94 Kasic, James A. Dismissed With Prejudice 46 46.0% Dismissed Without Prejudice 10 10.0% For Agency 5 5.0% For Employee Appellant 0.0% Settled 39 39.0% TOTAL 100 Miller, Patricia M. Dismissed With Prejudice 17 29.3% Dismissed Without Prejudice 10 17.2% For Agency 8 13.8% For Employee Appellant 2 3.4% Settled 21 36.2% TOTAL 58 Mish, Stephen C. Dismissed With Prejudice 28 38.4% Dismissed Without Prejudice 10 13.7% For Agency 13 17.8% For Employee Appellant 3 4.1% Settled 19 26.0% TOTAL 73 Witkin, Maxanne R. Dismissed With Prejudice 13 29.5% Dismissed Without Prejudice 5 11.4% For Agency 8 18.2% For Employee Appellant 0.0% Settled 18 40.9% TOTAL 44 Grand Total of Dockets for MSPB attorney examiners stationed in Denver 452 Two (2) Administrative Judges with no decisions for the employee appellant: James A. Kasic, Maxanne R. Witkin KEY: DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE / declared outside of MSPB's decision-making role. Categories include: Cancel or failure to prosecute, Jurisdiction or res judicata, Timeliness, Withdrawn by Appellant, (Action) Terminated DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE / request for postponement subject to being revisited FOR AGENCY / decision in favor of agency categories include: Affirmed, Corrective action not ordered FOR EMPLOYEE APPELLANT / decision in favor of employee categories include: Mitigate agency action, remanded to agency, reversed SETTLED / settled Data are from MSPB's FOIA grant CB10-80. Statistics exclude fields where appeal type specifies CSRA, FERS or FERCCA benefit claims